Chelsea 1-1 (4-3 p / k) Aston Villa, player ratings: Kepa penalty cheat code enabled

Another shootout, another hero turn from Kepa, which is approaching cheat code levels at this point when it comes to these things. Part of that is surely the preparation – we certainly know the importance of this with Petr Čech, Christoph Lollichon and Hilário in charge – but part of it is surely just a little magic dust and a great heap of trust, which is particularly commendable given his run at Chelsea so far.

It should be noted that Kepa was also very good during the match itself, and as he was beaten by a powerful (and impossible to save) header that peeked under the bar in the corner. superior, he also made six saves, picked up a couple crosses, and was safe in his possession. Two big goalie gloves in the air for this guy!

Look, this tweet got over 5,000 likes, so I think that means I did, or something like that. Plus, Reecey was awesome and his versatility continues to be an added boon.

Not only was RLC making his first start for Chelsea since the very first game last season, but it turned out he was doing so in a role quite different from what we expected. Even with Kanté on the pitch to start, Ruben lined up as the deepest of the three midfielders, playing as a presenter and also occasionally as a box-to-box force (especially later in the game, when we settled in and improved).

Is this its potential role in the future? He certainly has the skills and the strength to do it, and his ball retention and dribbling could offer a new dimension. We’ve seen a similar transformation once before with Mikel John Obi, after all! Obviously, this is just a game, but an intriguing option perhaps.

vs ASTON VILLA (LC, H, D 1-1; 4-3p / k)


EXCELLENT (8.0-8.9): Arrizabalaga (8.5), James (8.1)

GOOD (7.0-7.9): Loftus-Cheek (7.7), Chaloba (7.4), Werner (7.4)

MEDIUM (6.0-6.9): Kanté (6.9), Rise (6.9, under), Lukaku (6.6, under), Barkley (6.4, under), Chilwell (6.2), Hudson-Odoi (6.2), Sarr (6.2)

BAD (5.0-5.9): Saul (5.7), Ziyech (5.6)

BAD (4.0-4.9): –

TERRIBLE (3.0-3.9): –


Source link